A documented regression testing plan prioritised by product risk, showing which areas deserve automation earliest and which are better handled through manual testing.
01 / Overview
Many teams automate whatever is simplest and are then surprised when defects keep escaping. We start from a different question: where would a failure cause the most damage? We assess your current coverage, order features by risk level, then set out a plan across unit, integration, contract and end-to-end testing, including the areas that are better kept manual. The plan also defines release entry and exit criteria, so the decision to ship rests on a standard everyone has agreed rather than on gut feeling or whoever happens to be most confident that day.
02 / Deliverables
03 / Fit
Ideal for
What we need from you
You share these through the technical brief in your dashboard after checkout.
04 / Outcomes
Automation is focused where failures would cost the most
A clear, justifiable line separating automated checks from manual ones
Release decisions measured against documented criteria
This is a remote engineering service, so nothing is shipped physically. Work is delivered into systems you control. Read delivery & handover and refunds & cancellation for the full terms.
Load testing that finds exactly where your system breaks under traffic, identifies which component fails first and puts hard numbers against each finding.
Contract testing that fails the build as soon as an endpoint alters its response structure, so server releases no longer break the apps and partners depending on them.
Manual testing of your mobile app on the phones your customers actually use, rather than only on the latest premium model sitting on a desk.
Browser-level automated testing of your most important user flows, built into the delivery pipeline and stable enough that every result is taken seriously by your engineers.
Choose a published service, or describe the problem and we will point you to the right starting place.